Application for condonation of delay in filing criminal appeal from conviction order
Application allowed; delay in filing appeal condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-APPA-25-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.9 OF 2017
Dinkar Manohar Gangode )...Applicant V/s. State Of Maharashtra )...Respondent
Smt. Aisha Ansari, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. P.H.Gaikwad-Patil, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 24th MARCH, 2017.
P.C. :
This is an application for condonation of delay of
about 90 days in filing appeal challenging the judgment and order
of conviction of the applicant-accused at the hands of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik.
3 The learned APP opposed the application by contending that no 'sufficient cause' is made out.
4 Reasons stated for seeking condonation of delay is
Shivgan 1/2
11-APPA-25-2017.doc
financial crunch. Considering the stated reasons, the following order:
(1) The application is allowed. Delay in filing
appeal is condoned.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
2/2
Shivgan
Dinkar Manohar Gangode
State Of Maharashtra
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
