An interim order regarding a disposed intervention application in a criminal appeal matter. The court permitted the intervenor to withdraw their application for intervention.
Application for intervention disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(2)APPANo.302017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.455 OF 2014
Shrikant Aba Patil ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Vikram Singh Parmar i/b. Kedar Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.Nitin Pradhan i/b. Mr.S.D.Khot, Advocate for the applicant in APPA/768/2016 with APEAL/455/2014.
Mr.A.R.Mundargi, Senior Advocate i/b. Hrishikesh Mundargi, Advocate for the appellant in APEAL/506/2014.
Mr.Rakesh Singh with Mr.Pushkal Mishra i/b. M.V.Kini & Co., Advocate fort the Respondent No.2.
Ms.A.A.Takalkar, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 23rd MARCH 2017.
P.C. :
1 This is an application for intervention in Criminal Application No.724 of 2014. The learned Advocate appearing for the intervenor seeks permission to withdraw this application for intervenor.
1/2
Gaikwad RD
(2)APPANo.302017
2 In this view of the matter, application for intervention is disposed of as withdrawn.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
2/2
Gaikwad RD
Shrikant Aba Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Gaikwad RD
A.M.Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
