Brief order disposing of a criminal application seeking copies of paper books. The High Court found the documents were collected by the applicant's advocate and no further orders were required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 9.cri.appa.4.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2017 IN
CRI. APPEAL NO. 654 OF 2015
Parshuram Babu Balwad
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam Advocate for Applicant Mrs. S.D. Shinde A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATED : JANUARY 12, 2017
P.C.:
1 The prayer of the applicant is that copies of the paper books be furnished to him so that he can give it to his advocate. It is seen that the applicant is represented by advocate Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam and he has filed his Vakalatnama in the appeal preferred by the appellant. Advocate Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam who is now present in the Court, states that the paper books are ready and he will collect the same from the Office. In this view of the matter, no further
1 of 2
kandarkar
jdk 2 9.cri.appa.4.17.doc
orders are necessary.
[ REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
2 of 2
Parshuram Babu Balwad
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
