Vijay Bhivajirao Palande v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Application seeking disciplinary action against an advocate was dismissed as the High Court held it was not an appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5b. cri appa 1410-15.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1410 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 469 OF 2003
Vijay Bhivajirao Palande .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Appearances
Mrs. S.D. Shinde APP for the Stae
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 10, 2017.
P.C.:
action against Advocate Mr. Kuldeep Patil for his professional
misconduct.
sought by the applicant, hence, it would be open to the
applicant to approach the appropriate forum.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
5b. cri appa 1410-15.doc
hence, the application is disposed of.
[ REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
Vijay Bhivajirao Palande
State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court