fisherman pulled out the clothes from the water at the instance of appellant-Satyendra, the second time i.e. on 18th August, 1991. The said witness has stated that what was found was a pant (Article 17) and a shirt (Article 13), whereas, the panchanama (Exhibit 38) shows that two pants were recovered. As far as PW 8-Mhasku Chandilkar, the second fisherman is concerned, he pulled out the knife from the water. The said witness has not identified the appellant-Satyendra. A perusal of the evidence of both these witnesses show, that the timings disclosed by them, are completely in variance with each other, with regard to both the panchanamas, one drawn on 13th and the other, on 18th August, 1991. As far as panchanama dated 13th August, 1991 is concerned, PW 7 – Jalindar has stated that he alongwith other fishermen were called to the police station 3 years prior, were made to sit in a vehicle and the police took them behind Telco; that the appellant threw a stone in the quarry and showed the place. He has stated that 4-5 persons entered the water and took search, however, nothing was found. It has come in the cross-examination of PW 7-Jalindar, that for the first time (13th August, 1991), he was called to the Police Station at 9:00 a.m; that he was thereafter taken to a stone quarry at about 9:00 a.m. and after swimming for about 1½ hours, he returned back to his house at
