Ashwin Ramchandra Tetu Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Kurha Tah. Tiosa Amravati and Another

¶1

1 apl.671.16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶3

Criminal Application [APL] No.671 of 2016

¶4

(Ashwin Ramchandra Tetu

¶5

vs.

¶6

State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Kurha, Tah. Tiosa, Dist. Amravati & another)

¶7

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

¶9

Shri S.S. Shingane, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri V.P. Maldhure, Advocate for Non-Applicant No.1. Shri Y.P. Kaslikar, Advocate for Non-Applicant No.2.

¶10

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : MARCH 6, 2017.

¶11

Heard.

¶12

The application has been filed for quashing and setting aside the first information report registered against the applicant vide Crime No.225/2016 with the Police Station Kurha, Tahsil Tiwsa, District Amravati for the offences punishable under Sections 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

In the afÏdavit-in-reply filed on behalf of non-applicant no.1, it is stated that during investigation, it is found that the allegations levelled against the present applicant and the other accused

¶14

2 apl.671.16

¶15

are baseless and that non-applicant no.2 tried to mislead the police authorities. It is further stated that the Investigating OfÏcer has forwarded the proposal to the Sub-Divisional Police OfÏcer, SubDivision Chandur Railway for permission to file 'B' Summary in the matter.

¶16

In that view of the matter, the purpose of filing the application is served. The application is thus disposed of accordingly.

¶17

JUDGE JUDGE

¶18

*sdw

Ashwin Ramchandra Tetu v. State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Kurha Tah. Tiosa Amravati and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashwin Ramchandra Tetu v. State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Kurha Tah. Tiosa Amravati and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anmol S/O Shankar Bodele Vs Shri. S.L. Ahire, the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Bhandara

Sana Amankhan Pathan (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Ballarpur Dist. Chandrapur

Rahul S/O Madan Raut and Others Vs State of Maha. Thr. Police Station Officer

Anil S/O Kawduji Awale Vs the State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, P. S. Jaripatka, Nagpur and Another

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Duggipar Police Station, Duggipar Vs Bhanu @ Bhaskar @ Bhimrao S/O Mangal Bhowte and Others

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Duggipar Police Station, Duggipar Vs Bhanu @ Bhaskar @ Bhimrao S/O Mangal Bhowte and Others