This contempt petition challenging non-compliance with prior transfer-related orders is rejected because the petitioner himself failed to make the required representation to the respondent.
The contempt petition is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp.6.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
Contempt Petition No.6 of 2017
(Anmol Shankar Bodele
vs.
Shri S.L. Ahire, the Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zilla Parishad, Bhandara)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Petitioner in person. Shri A.Y. Kapgate, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : MARCH 3, 2017.
Heard.
By this contempt petition, the petitioner challenges non-compliance with the order passed by this Court dated 15/11/2016 and the order dated 02/12/2016.
Vide order dated 15/11/2016, the Court had permitted the petitioner to make representation for his transfer to Virshi. Vide the said order, the petitioner was granted liberty to withdraw the said petition by directing the respondent-Zilla Parishad to consider his representation, if made, for his transfer to Virshi. The subsequent review application filed by the petitioner has also been
2 cp.6.17
dismissed by this Court vide order dated 02/12/2016.
Undisputedly, the petitioner has not made any representation to the Zilla Parishad for his transfer to Virshi. When the representation itself is not made, there is no question of consideration of the same.
In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference in the contempt jurisdiction. The contempt petition is thus rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
*sdw
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case for contempt is made out where the petitioner failed to make the representation required by the impugned order for his transfer.
Anmol Shankar Bodele
Shri S.L. Ahire
B.R. Gavai
Kum. Indira Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
