In a criminal application under the Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, the High Court disposed of the matter as withdrawn after the State accepted a report stating the applicant was not an accused.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl-150.17
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.150 OF 2017
Mr. Vishal Subhash Kadakia … Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Atul G. Damle, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. Sameer P. Nangre for the Applicant.
Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : 14th MARCH, 2017
P.C.
.
Not on board. Taken on board.
1 The learned APP has tendered across the bar a report which is taken on record and marked 'A' for identification. The report has been submitted by the Inspector of Flying Squad No.1 of the State Excise, Mumbai (Suburbs). In the report, it is stated that charge sheet has been filed in the concerned case in which the applicant is neither shown as an accused nor as an absconding accused. We accept the statements made in the report. In view of the statements, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application. Accordingly, the application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
1 of 1
Vishal Subhash Kadakia
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
Anuja PrabhuDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
