Two writ petitions were disposed of as withdrawn upon the Petitioner seeking permission after the Court noted it could not entertain quashing prayers based on an alleged settlement. The Court reserved no adjudication on merits.
The petitions were disposed of as withdrawn by the Petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9 cri wp 575 and 576-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 575 OF 2017 ALONG WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 576 OF 2017
Kutubuddin Husainbhai Lokhandwala ..Petitioner
(in both the petitions)
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents (in both the petitions)
Mr. Kezer Kharawala i/b. Lex Juris for the Petitioner. Mrs. S.V.Sonawane, APP for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Sahil Mahajan for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S.OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 10TH MARCH, 2017
P.C.
quashing cannot be entertained on the basis of the alleged settlement, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the petitions. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of as withdrawn.
1 of 2
pps
9 cri wp 575 and 576-17.doc
chargesheet has been filed, this Order will not come in the way of the Petitioner filing appropriate proceeding before the Concerned Court.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
2 of 2
pps
Kutubuddin Husainbhai Lokhandwala
The State of Maharashtra
A.S.Oka
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
