This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28 apl 110-15=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2015
Shri. Ameet N. Momay
… Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
Mr. L.R. Shukla i/b Kenny Thakkar for the Applicant. Mr. Prashant Jadhav APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Mahesh Agarkar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2017
P.C.:
. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that Advocate on record is in personal difficulty and he seeks time.
2 Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.2 submitted that present application has became infructuous as the impugned order dated 03.06.2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 49th Court, Vikroli in D.V. Case No. 59/N of 2013 has already been executed.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Sneha Chavan
Shri. Ameet N. Momay
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
