This arrest in test present a petition to intervene as a respondent in an anticipatory bail application. The court allowed the intervention and directed the impleadment of the first informant within two weeks.
Intervention allowed; applicant directed to implead first informant as respondent No. 2 within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
appp.333-2017
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2017 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 586 OF 2017
Mrs. Shalini Shashank Dubey ..Applicant.
In the matter between Shashank Kshamanath Dubey Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mr. K.R. Shah i/b Law Juris for applicant in ABA 586/2017. Mr. Rajesh More with Amrita Agarwal for Applicant/Intervener. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for State.
CORAM: A.S. GADKARI, J.
DATE : 14th September 2017.
P.C.
1] This is an application for intervention by the informant in CR No.346 of 2016 registered with Khargar Police Station, Navi Mumbai.
2] For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2/2
appp.333-2017
3] Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No.586 of 2017 is
hereby directed to implead the first informant as respondent No.2. Amendment to be carried out within 2 weeks from today and an amended copy of the application be served upon the respondent No.2/first informant within same stipulated period.
4] Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
(A.S. GADKARI,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the informant in an ongoing criminal investigation should be allowed to intervene as a respondent in the anticipatory bail petition.
Shalini Shashank Dubey
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
