The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the Criminal Appeal as withdrawn by the counsel for the appellant. No substantive decision or legal reasoning was recorded.
Criminal Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; appellant directed to approach Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
crap570.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 570 OF 2017
DHANRAJ S/O. RAJESAHEB SHINDE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Mr.Sachin S. Deshmukh. Advocate for the appellant.
Mr.V.S. Badakh, APP for respondent/State.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :15.12.2017
P.C. :-
1.Learned Counsel for the appellant wants to
withdraw the proceeding. The Criminal Appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant may approach the
Sessions Court.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.]
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.]
snk/2017/DEC17/ crap570.17
DHANRAJ S/O. RAJESAHEB SHINDE AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
T.V. NALAWADE
S.M.GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court