Dismissed
Nilkanth Laxman Wankhede and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCAPEAL/438/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
criapl438.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 438 OF 2016
NILKANTH LAXMAN WANKHEDE AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.M.B.Sandanshiv, Advocate for the appellant
Mr.V.S.Badakh, APP for the respondent/State
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE &
S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED :14.12.2017
P.C. :-
.Seen the office note. Learned counsel for the
appellant submitted that the appellant is not in touch
with him and probably she got married.
2.This Court could have appointed somebody as
amicus curie. It appears from the grievance of the
prosecutrix that she had not given evidence against the
accused. In view of these circumstances this Court is not
feeling it proper to appoint somebody as amicus curie.
This circumstance however shall be considered if the
prosecutrix again comes to the Court. At present appeal
is dismissed for default.
VishalK/ criapl438.16
NILKANTH LAXMAN WANKHEDE AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
T.V. NALAWADE
S.M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court