Single-judge order dismissing Criminal Application No. 41 of 2017 for want of prosecution due to the applicant's non-appearance on multiple adjourned dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 aba41.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Criminal Application (ABA) No. 41 of 2017
Harshal v. The State of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri V. P. Maldhure, APP for respondent-State
Coram : S. B. Shukre, J
Dated : April 27, 2017
On 27th March 2017, a request was made on behalf of the applicant for grant of short time. Request was granted and the matter was kept for hearing on 31st March 2017. On that day, nobody appeared for the applicant and, therefore, matter came to be adjourned to 7th April 2017. On that day also, nobody appeared for the applicant. Once again, in order to give further opportunity to applicant, the matter was adjourned to this date. Today, nobody is present on behalf of the applicant. Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
joshi
Harshal
The State of Maharashtra
S. B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
