Allowed

Aman @ Sayed Shamshuddinsayed Anisuddin v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Shegaon, Tq. Shegaon Dist. Buldhana

Bombay HC25 Apr 2017BA/51/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed a criminal application for bail in a trial involving offences under the IPC relating to counterfeit Indian currency, relying on inordinate delay and evidence nature from a connected case.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail to the extent of Rs.50,000/- with one solvent surety in the like amount, subject to specified conditions.

Aman @ Sayed Shamshuddinsayed Anisuddin Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1 ba51.17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.51 OF 2017

¶4

(Aman @ Syed Shamshuddin Sayed Anisuddin ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through PSO, PS Shegaon, District Buldhana)

¶5

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

Court's or Judge's orders

¶8

¶9

Shri A.B. Mirza, Advocate for the applicant, Shri N.R. Patil, Addl.P.P. for the non-applicant/State.

¶10

CORAM : S.B. SHUKRE, J. DATED : 25-04-2017

¶11

Heard.

¶12

Perused the first information report, charge-sheet and report of the concerned Sessions Court filed in connected matter being Criminal Application (BA) No.13/2017. Criminal Application (BA) No.13/2017 has been just allowed by this Court by detailed order passed below it. That application has been allowed by this Court mainly on the ground of inordinate delay in conclusion of the trial in the instant case. The other factors, which have weighed by this Court relate to the nature of evidence, which has surfaced during the course of the trial. Those reasons and factors are also applicable to the facts of this application and therefore, this application also deserves to be allowed on the same lines.

¶13

The application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail in Crime

¶14

2 ba51.17

¶15

No.51/2013 registered with Police Station Shegaon, District Buldhana for the offences punishable under Sections 489-A, 489-B, 489-C and 489-D read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.50,000/- together with one solvent surety in the like amount, on the following conditions :

¶16

(i) The applicant shall report the concerned Police Station on every Sunday between 10-00 a.m. and 12-00 noon till the trial is over.

¶17

(ii) The applicant shall regularly attend the dates fixed by the Court and shall co-operate with the trial Court in expeditious disposal of the trial.

¶18

(iii)The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.

¶19

JUDGE

¶20

adgokar

Aman @ Sayed Shamshuddinsayed Anisuddin v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Shegaon, Tq. Shegaon Dist. Buldhana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman @ Sayed Shamshuddinsayed Anisuddin v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Shegaon, Tq. Shegaon Dist. Buldhana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Raju S/O. Ashok Jangam (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso City Police Station Chandrapur

Shri. Anand S/O. Bajranglal Agarwal Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Instance of Shri. D. P. Antapurkar and Another

Saurabh Shridhar Tayade Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Police Station Balapur Dist. Akola

Prashant S/O Anjaya Yadawar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Sub Inspector, State Excise Department, Gadchiroli

Pralhad @ Pratap S/O Tanbaji Pawar Vs State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. P.S. Bhandara

Bablu @ Aniskhan Yunus Khan (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer, Police Station Shegaon Dist. Buldhana