The High Court of Bombay disposed of two writ petitions based on Consent Minutes of Order signed by respective advocates of the petitioner and respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Time for amendment was extended.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(3) WPL 888-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Amk
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 888 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 889 OF 2016
Maimuna Farid Raja
...Petitioner
Versus
The Chief Officer, Mumbai Building Repairs & Construction & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Rajiv Narula i/b Vaibhav Mehta & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. V. P. Sawant for Respondent Nos.1 & 2/MHADA. Ms. Kavita Shah for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : S. C. GUPTE, J. DATE : 12th APRIL, 2016.
P. C. :
petitioner (occupant) and respondent No.3 (developer). The petitioner and respondent No.3 have agreed to Consent Minutes of Order by which the present petition can be disposed of. The Consent
Minutes of Order have been duly signed by their respective Advocates. The Advocate of respondent Nos.1 & 2 has signed the Minutes for the purpose of identification. Learned Counsel pray for disposal of the petition in terms of the Minutes. Consent Minutes of
Order are taken on record, marked 'X' for identification. The
1/2
(3) WPL 888-16
statements and undertakings contain therein are accepted.
terms of order dated 06.04.2016 is extended upto 18.04.2016.
(S. C. GUPTE, J.)
2/2
Maimuna Farid Raja
The Chief Officer, Mumbai Building Repairs
MHADA
Director, Mumbai
S. C. GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court