Disposed

Indian Education Society v. Indian Education Society'S Employees' Union and Anr.

Bombay HC12 Apr 2016WP/910/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Coram S.C. Gupte, J., this order sets aside an Industrial Court order dated 1st February, 2016. The petitioner's amendment application is allowed, though averments therein are not accepted. The Industrial Court is directed to dispose of pending complaints within three months. Petitioner pays costs.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order of the Industrial Court is set aside. The amendment application of the petitioner is allowed. Respondents shall be entitled to lead additional evidence. The Industrial Court shall d

Indian Education Society Vs Indian Education… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

(28) WPL 871-16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

Amk

¶4

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 871 OF 2016

¶5

Indian Education Society ...Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Shri Ramesh Ghanashyam Bhowar ...Respondents & Ors.

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 875 OF 2016

¶10

Indian Education Society ...Petitioner

¶11

Versus

¶12

Indian Education Society Employees' ...Respondents Union & Anr.

¶13

Mr. Kiran S. Bapat i/b Nandini G. Menon for the Petitioner. Mr. S. N. Deshpande for the Respondents.

¶14

CORAM : S. C. GUPTE, J. DATE : 12th APRIL, 2016.

¶15

P. C. :

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

Learned counsel for both the parties agree that the

¶18

petition may be disposed of without indicating reasons for the order. Accordingly, the following order is passed:

¶19

(i) The impugned order of the Industrial Court dated 1^st

¶20

1/2

¶21

(28) WPL 871-16

¶22

February, 2016 is set aside.

¶23

(ii) The amendment application of the petitioner is allowed. (iii) However, it is made clear that none of the averments introduced by the petitioner by way of amendment of the written statement are accepted by respondent Nos.1 to 7. All contentions of the parties on merits of the amendment are kept open.

¶24

(iv) Respondent Nos.1 to 7 shall be entitled to lead such additional evidence as they may desire in connection with the amendments to the written statement allowed hereby.

¶25

(v) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he shall examine one witness on its behalf in the pending complaints.

¶26

(vi) The Industrial Court shall dispose of the pending complaints as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of 3 months from today.

¶27

(vii) The petitions are disposed of accordingly.

¶28

(viii) The petitioner shall pay the costs of these petitions quantified at Rs.10,000/- each to respondent Nos.1 to 7.

¶29

(S. C. GUPTE, J.)

¶30

2/2

Indian Education Society v. Indian Education Society'S Employees' Union and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indian Education Society v. Indian Education Society'S Employees' Union and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anant Mahadeo Pimple Vs Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children and 4 Ors.

Mazagon Dock Ltd. Vs Rohidas Bhagoji Duraphe Mumbra, Thane.

prabhat udyog Ltd. Vs Smt Sunita Sahadeo Topale

Indian Education Society Vs Ramesh Ghanashyam Bhowar and 7 Ors.

M/S Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. Vs Kishore Govind Magar and Anr.

Maimuna Farid Raja Vs the Chief Officer, Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction and 2 Ors.