The High Court disposed of a writ petition by issuing directions to respondent no.2 to decide on the petitioner's representation regarding a specific claim within six months.
Directions to respondent no.2 to take a decision on the petitioner's representation within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 3-wp9505.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.9505 OF 2016
LOTU DEVICHAND RANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.Girish Nagori, Advocate for petitioner
Mr.M.M.Nerlikar, AGP for respondent nos.1, 2 and 4
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.This petition can be disposed of by
issuing directions to respondent no.2 to take a
decision on the representation tendered by the
petitioner on 30.03.2016 in accordance with the
provisions of law and considering the merits of
the claim of the petitioner, as expeditiously as
possible and preferably, within a period of six
months from today and it is accordingly directed.
3.The Writ Petition stands disposed of as
such.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]
kbp
Lotu Devichand Rane
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court