Contempt petition filed in connection with a writ petition. The court noted the petitioner's representation was settled by the respondent Chief Executive Officer. Consequently, the instant petition was disposed of as it did not survive.
Disposed of; Contempt Petition does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 30-cp496.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 496 OF 2016
IN WP/1868/2014
SUNANDA MADHUKAR VAIJWADE
VERSUS
SURESH BEDMUTHA
Mr.R.N.Chavan, Advocate for petitioner
Mrs.Manjusha Deshpande, Advocate for respondent
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.The learned Counsel for the respondent
has placed on record a copy of the communication
dated 22/30.12.2014 mentioning therein that the
representation tendered by the petitioner has been
dealt with and the same has been rejected by the
respondent - Chief Executive Officer. The
communication is taken on record and marked as "X"
for identification.
2 30-cp496.odt
3.In view of the decision rendered by the
respondent - Chief Executive Officer the instant
Contempt Petition does not survive and stands
disposed of accordingly.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]
kbp
SUNANDA MADHUKAR VAIJWADE
SURESH BEDMUTHA
R.M. BORDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court