Petitioners challenged a tender notice issued for construction of a storage tank on their land without acquisition. The tenders same part积极配合
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 9441.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9441 OF 2011
Dadahari Maruti Bedre and others .. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Vinayak H. Solanke, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1, 5 to 7. Mrs. Kalplata Patil Bharaswadkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
Shri U. B. Bondar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 8
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 28TH JUNE, 2016.
PER COURT :
. Heard the learned counsel for petitioners. The grievance of petitioners is that, without acquiring the land of petitioners tender notice is issued by the respondents for construction of the storage tank on the land of the petitioner.
2 WP 9441.11
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/June 16
Dadahari Maruti Bedre and others
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 3
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
K. K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
