Disposed

Shri. N. Thangaraj v. Shri. P. K. Padhy, through Secretary, Ministry of Labours and Employment and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Jun 2016WP/9257/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition challenging the dismissal of a contempt petition by the Central Administrative Tribunal. The petitioner was afforded the right to approach the appropriate forum separately.

What did the court decide?

This petition is disposed of with rights of the petitioner to agitate before appropriate forum by filing a separate petition.

Shri. N. Thangaraj Vs Shri. P. K. Padhy, through Secretary… — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

(9) WP 9257-14

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

Amk

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 9257 OF 2014

Shri N. Thangaraj

...Petitioner

Versus

Shri P. K. Padhy & Ors.

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

Mr. R. G. Panchal a/w. Mr. S. L. Jadhav for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.

¶11

CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 9 th JUNE, 2016.

¶12

P. C. :

¶13

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the

¶14

Central Administrative Tribunal in contempt petition filed by the petitioner. By the said order the Central Administrative Tribunal was pleased to dismiss the contempt petition. It is an admitted position

¶15

that the appeal or writ petition against the order of dismissal of contempt petition is not maintainable. Apart from that, perusal of the order indicates that the Tribunal after going through record, has come to the conclusion that the substantial compliance was made and, therefore, it had held that no contempt was committed.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that apart from setting aside of the dismissal of contempt petition, the petitioner is

¶17

1/2

¶18

(9) WP 9257-14

¶19

also seeking some other reliefs.

¶20

Reserving the right of the petitioner to agitate his right before the appropriate forum by filing a separate petition, this petition is disposed of.

¶21

(M. S. SONAK, J.) (V. M. KANADE, J.)

¶22

2/2

Shri. N. Thangaraj v. Shri. P. K. Padhy, through Secretary, Ministry of Labours and Employment and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. N. Thangaraj v. Shri. P. K. Padhy, through Secretary, Ministry of Labours and Employment and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akanksha Sales Promotion (India) Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Ors. Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and Anr.

Union of India and 3 Ors. Vs Shri Doming C. Dias

Homi Faramroz Patrawala Vs State Bank of India and 3 Ors.

Shri. M. R. Phadtare Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Co-Operation and Anr.

Shri. M. R. Phadtare Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Co-Operation and Anr.

Shri Sunil Tukaram Bharadkar Vs Union of India through Dept and Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and 5 Others