Petitioners withdrew a writ petition challenging the disposal of their names from a holiday list by the Respondent, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition if the tender process was improper. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
(WP 1316 of 2016).
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1316 OF 2016
Akanksha Sales Promotion (India) Pvt. Ltd.and Ors. ….Petitioners
Vs.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and Anr.
….Respondents
Ms. Ridhi Nyati for Petitioners
Mr. Vishesh Karla i/b. Vidhi Partners for Respondent No.1 ******
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 8, 2016
P.C. :
that the name of the Petitioners were put on the holiday list by the Respondents. However, now their names have been removed from the holiday
list. Therefore, the learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in the event
2/2
(WP 1316 of 2016).
the tender process is not properly conducted.
is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
Sd/-
M.S. SONAK, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Akanksha Sales Promotion (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and Anr.
M.S. SONAK
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
