In a writ petition challenging dismissal from service as a professor, the High Court observed that alternate remedies are available under the statute. The bench kept merit issues open and disposed of the petition without addressing the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk 1/1 WP917815.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9178 OF 2015
Dr. Madhav Rangrao Patil … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. C. G. Gavnekar for the petitioner. Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for the State. Mr. G. S. Ingale for respondent Nos.5 & 6.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ .
P.C.
. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.5 and 6 submits that consequent to the inquiry conducted against the petitioner who was discharging his duties as professor at the relevant time, the petitioner has been dismissed from service. He further submits that alternate remedy is available.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Dr. Madhav Rangrao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
