A writ petition filed by a dismissed professor was disposed of by the High Court. The Court held that alternate statutory remedies were available to the petitioner and kept all issues on merits open.
Petition disposed; all issues on merits kept open; alternate remedy directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk 1/1 WP-9178-15.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9178 OF 2015
Dr. Madhav Rangrao Patil … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. C. G. Gavnekar for the petitioner. Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for the State. Mr. G. S. Ingale for respondent Nos.5 & 6.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ .
P.C.
. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.5 and 6 submits that consequent to the inquiry conducted against the petitioner who was discharging his duties as professor at the relevant time, the petitioner has been dismissed from service. He further submits that alternate remedy is available.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether alternate remedies under the statute are available to the petitioner dismissed from service as professor.
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of on merits or dismissed on ground of alternative remedy.
Dr. Madhav Rangrao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent Nos.5
Respondent Nos.6
NARESH H. PATIL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
