Single-line order disposing of a writ petition on the ground that the legal issue raised was already concluded in a previous decision rendered the same day.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp874316.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8743 OF 2016
Sow. Maya w/o Narayan Fathelaskar
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.B.G.Sagade, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.S.Patil, AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.L.WADANE, JJ. DATE : 12th August, 2016
PER COURT:
Issue raised in the instant petition has already been concluded in view of the decision rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No.1981 of 2016, decided on 5th August, 2016.
In view of this, writ petition stands disposed of.
K.L.WADANE JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/wp874316
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.1981 of 2016Referred¶14
Sow. Maya w/o Narayan Fathelaskar
State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
