The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed a writ petition stating that the proceedings pending before concerned authorities were already decided, causing the petitioner's grievance to no longer survive.
Writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp204216.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2042 OF 2016
Govind s/o Nagurao Aurade
Petitioner
Versus
The District Collector, Osmanabad, and others
Respondents
Mr.Amit A. Mukhedkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.B.Bharaswadkar, AGP for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.L.WADANE, JJ. DATE : 12th August, 2016
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel appearing for petitioner, on instructions, states that the proceedings pending before the concerned authorities are already decided and as such, grievance raised by the petitioner, in the instant petition, does not survive.
Writ Petition, therefore, stands disposed of.
K.L.WADANE JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/wp204216
Govind s/o Nagurao Aurade
The District Collector, Osmanabad
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
