The High Court of Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 863 of 2014 after granting leave to the petitioner to withdraw the petition based on a communication received from the petitioner's advocate.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.863-2014
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 863 OF 2014
Dinesh Brijesh Varma ..Petitioner. Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Abhishek Kaushik i/b Kaushik & Co. for Petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pimple for B.M.C.
CORAM: RANJIT MORE AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ.
DATE: 15th JULY 2016
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the Petitioner has placed on record the
communication dated 14 July 2016 issued by the Petitioner to the Advocate
on record. By the said communication, the Advocate for the Petitioner is instructed to withdraw the petition.
Pursuant to the said communication, the learned counsel for
the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted.
Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(A.S. GADKARI,J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
Dinesh Brijesh Varma
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
