The writ petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution by the petitioner, who did not appear on the current or previous hearing occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3980 OF 2013
Milind Yashwant Nikam. Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. M. Kamble for Respondent No. 4 to 16.
Coram : Ranjit More & A. S. Gadkari, JJ. Date : July 14, 2016 .
P. C. :
[A. S. GADKARI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
Milind Yashwant Nikam
State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
