This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Writ Petition No.8500/2010
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.8500 OF 2010
Pandurang s/o Manikrao Patil ... PETITIONER VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others ... RESPONDENTS
Ms M.S. Mhase, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for State Shri S.S. Manale, Advocate for respondent No.3 Shri V.D. Salunke, Advocate for respondent No.5
CORAM: R.M. BORDE AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATED: 20th January, 2016.
ORAL ORDER :
Writ Petition No.8500/2010
2
Irrigation, Zilla Parishad, Latur, wherein it has been stated that the work of the scheme undertaken earlier has exhausted its maximum life span and the new repair works were required to be undertaken in respect of water supply scheme. It is further stated that, the exhaustive repairs in the old water supply infrastructure were made and as on today, the water supply scheme is functional, and enough water is being supplied to the villagers. In this view of the matter, according to us, the grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant petition stands redressed. Writ Petition stands disposed of.
fmp/wp8500.10
Pandurang s/o Manikrao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
