The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad rejected a contempt petition filed by a petitioner who had not received any relief in the underlying writ petition, holding that no breach of directions could have occurred and the petition was misconceived and unentertainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.555/2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.555 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4089 OF 2014
Dattu s/o Chimaji Salve ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
... RESPONDENTS
Shri A.G. Ambetkar, Advocate for petitioner Shri B.V. Virdhe, A.G.P. for State Shri V.D. Hon, Senior Counsel with Shri A.V. Hon, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM: R.M. BORDE AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED: 20th January, 2016.
ORAL ORDER :
Contempt Petition No.555/2015
2
prosecuting the Contempt Petition. It ought to have been understood that Contempt Petition is entertainable only in the event there is breach of any direction. In the instant matter, there is no direction issued in favour of the petitioner and as such, there arises no question of committing any breach of such directions. The contempt petition is rejected.
fmp/cp555.15
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dattu s/o Chimaji Salve
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borse
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
