The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner. The court recorded the application for withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly. No substantive legal issue was resolved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 85 OF 2015
M/S VEDANTA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS., ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents
... Respondents
Ms. M. Furtado, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Rebello, Addl. Government Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:F. M. REIS & K. L. WADANE, JJ. Date:21st March, 2016
P.C.
Ms. M. Furtado, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed an application dated 16.03.2016 supported by an affidavit inter-alia stating that the petitioner desires to withdraw the above petition as the award came to be passed on 26.10.2015. The said application is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
K. L. WADANE, J. F. M. REIS, J.
at*
M/s Vedanta Real Estate Developers
State of Goa
F. M. REIS
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
