Leave to amend the writ petition was granted. The amended petition was to be filed within a week, and respondents were granted liberty to file an additional reply.
Leave to amend the petition granted; liberty to respondents to file additional reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 292 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 287 OF 2009
SHRI. PRASAD V. KENI. Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.
... Applicant
... Respondent
Ms. D. Shirgam, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. S. Dhargalkar, Additional Government Advocate, for the Respondent.
Coram:F. M. REIS &
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
Date:21st March, 2016
P.C.:
Heard Ms. D. shirgam, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant and Shri A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Advocate General appearing for the respondent.
K. L. WADANE, J. F. M. REIS, J.
ms
SHRI. PRASAD V. KENI
STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
F. M. REIS
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
