The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench quashed an order denying parole to a convicted petitioner. The court held the justification errorneous, directed release within two weeks.
Parole denied by Divisional Commissioner quashed, petitioner to be released within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp839.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 839 OF 2016
(VIKAS MOHANJI RAHANGDALE ..VS. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DN. & ANR.)
Ms S.B.Khobragade, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri J.Y.Ghurde, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 21, 2016.
JUDGE JUDGE
RRaut..
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the reason given for denying parole to the convicted petitioner to his mother's supervision is unsustainable.
Whether the impugned order rejecting parole should be quashed.
Vikas Mohanji Rahangdale
Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur DN.
B.P. Dharadhikari
Kum. Indira Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
