The High Court at Nagpur condoned a delay of 1031 days in filing a criminal appeal by a convict in prison, admitting the appeal pursuant to an application.
Delay of 1031 days in filing appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC was condoned and appeal was admitted for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2012appa657.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 657 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2016
(Gurudas s/o Dayaram Kumbhare vs. The State of Maharashtra thr. PSO, PS Sakoli, Dist. Bhandara)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. DECEMBER 20, 2016.
Ms. S.H. Bhatia, learned counsel for the
applicant.
The prayer is to condone delay of 1031 days in filing appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by a convict in prison.
Mrs. N.R. Tripathi, learned APP for the nonapplicant – State, is seeking time to verify the facts.
However, as the applicant is in prison, we condone delay.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2016
Heard.
Admit .
Mrs. Tripathi, learned APP waives notice for the respondent.
Call for R. & P.
*GS.
JUDGE JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 1031 days in filing an appeal by a convict in prison can be condoned under Section 374(2) CrPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurudas s/o Dayaram Kumbhare
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
KUM. INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
