Noel Gerard Dsouza and Others v. the Government of India and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on account of passage of time.
What did the court decide?
No costs to the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-7914.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7914 OF 2013
Neel S/o Gerard D'souza and others ...PETITIONERS
versus
The Government of India and ors. ...RESPONDENTS
Mr. P.P. Sapkale, Advocate holding for Mr. Prashsing B. Patil, Advocate for petitioners Mr. S.B. Deshpande, ASG for respondents No. 1 to 3 Mr. S.M. Ganachari,AGP for respondents No. 4 Mr. Sumit S. Joshi, Advocate for respondents No. 5 and 6
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 9th JUNE, 2016.
Order :-
Sd/-
Sd/-
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
MTK
Neel S/o Gerard D'souza and others
The Government of India and ors.
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court