The High Court of Bombay granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition (No. 836 of 2015). Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and the accompanying notice of motion was disposed of.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The notice of motion stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-WP.836.2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 836 of 2015 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 429 OF 2015
Swastik Production Pvt. Ltd. } Petitioner versus National Animal Welfare } Board of India and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Shekhar Jagtap for the petitioner.
Ms. Namrata Shah i/b. M/s. K. Ashar and Co. for respondent no. 1.
Mr. Upendra Lokegaonkar i/b. Mr. N. R. Prajapati for respondent no. 4.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATED :- JULY 22, 2016
P.C. :-
The petitioner's advocate seeks leave to withdraw the
writ petition. Leave granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In the light of the withdrawal of the writ petition, the notice of motion does not survive and stands disposed of as such.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Swastik Production Pvt. Ltd.
National Animal Welfare Board of India
S. C. Dharmadhikari
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
