Petitioners withdrew their writ petition after being advised to file an appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The High Court dismissed the matter as withdrawn and vacated the interim order.
The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn; the ad-interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
916-WP.2372.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2372 OF 2014
M/s. Asis Logistics Limited } and Ors. } Petitioners versus State Bank of India } Respondents
Mr. Jay choksi with Mr. Jay Mehta i/b.M/s. Law Frame for the petitioners.
Mr. Lalitkumar Jain i/b. M/s. Lalitkumar Jain and Co. for the respondents.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATED :- JULY 22, 2016
P.C. :-
After the matter was argued for sometime and we were disinclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Leave granted. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. The ad-interim order is vacated forthwith. The writ petition is withdrawn by the petitioners' counsel as he has been informed that the petitioners have availed of an equally efficacious remedy of appeal under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Asis Logistics Limited
State Bank of India
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
