A writ petition was disposed of as the impugned order attaching the petitioner's property was withdrawn by the petitioner, rendering the merits unnecessary for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8045 OF 2016
S.K. Wheels Pvt. Ltd., Navi Mumbai .… Petitioner V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. V. Sridharan, Sr. Counsel, a/w. Mr. Chandrakant B. Thakar, Mr. Rahul Thakar, Mr. Puneeth Ganapathy, Mr. Girish Kalla and Mr. Himanshu Kode, for the Petitioner.
Mr. V.A. Sonpal, Special Counsel, a/w. Ms. Sushma Bhende, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr. Sunil Sangle, Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax, VAT Administration, Raigad Division, is present.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J. DATE : 13TH JULY, 2016.
P.C. :
1/2
WP-8045-16.doc
opinion on the rival contentions in so far as merits is concerned, we dispose of this Petition on the statement made by Mr. Sonpal.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]
2/2
WP-8045-16.doc
S.K. Wheels Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
