In two connected writ petitions, the Bombay High Court granted leave to the petitioners to withdraw their claims and disposed of the matters as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw writ petitions granted; disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Production1&2-WP.12246.2015+.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12246 OF 2015
Ramanand Ispat Ltd. and Anr. } Petitioners versus The Collector, Nashik and Ors. } Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 8000 OF 2016
Ramanand Ispat Ltd. and Ors. } Petitioners versus Union of India and Anr. } Respondents
Mr. M. V. Thorat for the petitioners.
Ms. Gauri Rao – AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 3 in WP/12246/2015 and for respondent no. 3 in WP/8000/2016.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATED :- JULY 12, 2016
P.C. :-
After these petitions were placed before us, the petitioners' advocate seeks leave to withdraw the writ petitions. Leave granted. The writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Ramanand Ispat Ltd. and Anr.
The Collector, Nashik and Ors.
Union of India and Anr.
S. C. Dharmadikari
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
