Petitioner submitted that an underlying civil order remained in force, rendering the Writ Petition infructuous. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the petition without costs.
The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.7984 OF 2015.
Pandurang Ramrao Jivrag Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.C.V.Bodkhe, advocate holding for Mr.R.V.Gore,
advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.B.V.Virdhe, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.K.SONAWANE,JJ. Date : 29.07.2016. PER COURT :
that the order passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aurangabad in RCS No.346/2015 is continued even till date. As such on instructions submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2
Dt.29.07.2016. asp/office/wp7984.15
Pandurang Ramrao Jivrag
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
