Writ petition disposed of as the petitioner deposited the claimed amount following earlier court directions, rendering the purpose of the petition subserved.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-7844.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7844 OF 2015
Sheshrao Kundlik Hinge
...PETITIONER
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ...RESPONDENTS
Mr. D.R. Jaybhar, Advocate for petitioner Smt. S.S. Raut, AGP for respondents No. 1 to 3
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 28th JULY, 2016.
Order :-
Sd/-
Sd/-
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
MTK
Sheshrao Kundlik Hinge
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
