Disposed

Sanjiwani Tatyaba Dhavad and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC22 Jun 2016WP/7948/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition by employees of a government-aided school. The petitioners sought to quash a government communication regarding school transfer and demanded directions for release of grant-in-aid. The court held that the grievance could be addressed via representation to the authorities.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to tender representation to respondents for consideration of grievances; writ petition disposed of.

Sanjiwani Tatyaba Dhavad and Others Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

WP794813.odt

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.7948 OF 2013

¶5

01 Miss Sanjiwani Tatyaba Dhavad, age: 43 years, Occ: Headmistress,
02 Smt. Savita Shankar Gawade, age: 30 years, Occ: Asstt. Teacher,
03 Kailas s/o Ashok Waghmare, age: 32 years, Occ: Asstt. Teacher,
04 Smt.Mumtaz Sunnilal Pathan, age: 32 years, Occ: Asstt. Teacher;
05 Sachin Vasant Girhe, age: 28 years, Occ: Asstt. Teacher;
06 Sandip Mohan Dhavad, age: 30 years, Occ: Clerk,
07 Satish Adinath Kardile, age: 29 years, Occ: Peon,
08 Sandip Dattu Thorat,
age: 29 years, Occ: Peon	Petitioners
Versus
01 The State of Maharashtra, through the Principal Secretary to Secondary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
02 The Deputy Director of Education, Pune Division, Pune.
03 The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar.
04 Maharashtra Gramin Vikas Mandal, A/p Pimprilauki, Azampur,

¶6

WP794813.odt

¶7

Tq. Sangamner, District Ahmednagar, through its President and/or Secretary.

¶8

05 Shri Sant Dnyaneshwar Gramin Vikas Pratisthan, A/p Manikdaundi, Tq. Pathardi, District Ahmednagar, through its President and/or Secretary.

¶9

06 Shri Gurudeo Datta Madhyamik Vidyalaya, A/p Manikdoundi, Tq. Pathardi, District Ahmednagar, through its Headmaster. Respondents

¶10

Mr.S.T.Shelke, advocate for petitioners.

¶11

Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, AGP with Mr.V.M.Kagane, AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.V.D.Hon, Senior Counsel i/by Mr.A.V.Hon, advocate for Respondent No.4. Mr.A.G.Ambetkar, advocate for Respondent No.5. Mr.P.R.Nangare, advocate for Respondent No.6.

¶12

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & P.R.BORA, JJ. Reserved on : 20^th June, 2016 Pronounced on: 22^nd June, 2016.

¶13

ORDER (Per R.M.Borde, J.):

¶14

1 Petitioners, who are employees of the school operated by Respondent No.6 – Management, are seeking to quash the communication issued by Respondent No.3 on 20.05.2013 and are praying for issuance of directions to Respondents No.1 to 3 for release of grant-in-aid in favour of Respondent No.6 school operated by Respondent No.4 management, as per the online

¶15

{3} WP794813.odt

¶16

evaluation report of Respondent No.6 school either by taking over the management or by appointing Administrator till dispute between Respondents No.4 and 5 is resolved.

¶17

2 We have considered grievance in respect of transfer of school while dealing with Writ Petition No.9132 of 2013 and the order issued by the State Government directing transfer of school has been quashed and set aside.

¶18

3 In the circumstances, it would be open for the petitioners to tender an appropriate representation to the Respondent authorities for consideration of their grievance. The Respondents shall take into consideration grievance of petitioners and may issue necessary directions in accordance with provisions of law.

¶19

4 In the event of occurrence of fresh cause, it would be open for the petitioners to approach this Court.

¶20

5 In view of above, writ petition is disposed of.

¶21

R.M.BORDE

¶22

JUDGE JUDGE adb/WP794813

¶23

P.R.BORA

Sanjiwani Tatyaba Dhavad and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjiwani Tatyaba Dhavad and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Afsar Shaikh Akbar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Suresh Asaram Nathbhajan (C-7291) Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vinay Shikshan Sanstha through Its Secretary Arun Chandrakant Misal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

The School Managing Committee, Shri Gurudev Datta Madhyamik Vidyalaya and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vaidyanath Shikshan Sanstha Parli through Its Secretary Vs Nandkishor Papalal Modi and Another

Santosh Pandurang More Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others