This is a consolidated writ petition where parties settled the dispute amicably and filed consent terms. The parties confirmed understanding of the terms, and the court disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
wp.7866-2016
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7866 OF 2016
Krantiveer Vasantrao Narayanrao Naik Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha & Anr.
..Petitioners.
Vs.
Dr. Vaishali Suryakant Rokade & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. Sandip D. Shinde for Petitioners. Mr. S.R. Karpe for Respondent No.1. Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for State.
CORAM: RANJIT MORE AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ.
DATE: 15th JULY 2016
P.C.:
1 The learned counsel for respective parties submitted that the
parties have settled their dispute amicably and have filed the consent terms dated 15 July 2016.
2 The said consent terms are signed by the Director of Petitioner
No.1 and the Principal of Respondent No.2 as well as Respondent No.1.
They are personally present in the Court. On a specific query, they
2/2
wp.7866-2016
submitted that they have gone through the consent terms and understood it.
They submitted that they have no objection for disposing of the petition in terms of the consent terms.
3 In view of the the same, said consent terms are taken on record
and marked as Exhibit “X” for identification.
4 Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the said consent terms.
(A.S. GADKARI,J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
Krantiveer Vasantrao Narayanrao Naik Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha & Anr.
Dr. Vaishali Suryakant Rokade & Ors.
Ranjit More
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
