Sau. Kavita Shyam Mirkute Vs the Registrar, District Court and Ors.

application was filed on 23/11/2015. According to the petitioner, inspite of the fact that respondents have been served, the matter is being adjourned from time to time. He submits that the dispute being the election dispute, it has to be decided as early as possible.

¶21

Having considered the submissions made by the petitioner and respondent No. 10, we are inclined to dispose of this Petition by directing the concerned Court to consider and decide the petitioner's Misc. Application No. 413 of 2015 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within 3 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Needless to say that this order will be operative only in case all the parties are served before the said Court. Petition is disposed of.

¶22

( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)

¶23

2/2

Sau. Kavita Shyam Mirkute v. the Registrar, District Court and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sau. Kavita Shyam Mirkute v. the Registrar, District Court and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramanlal Vyas and 12 Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Reliance Corporate It Park Limited Vs Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Shubhangi Shrikant Birje Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept and Ors.

Jafar Kasam Hasba through Constituted Attorney Ms. Khurshid Hasba Vs the Grampanchayat of Arkal and Ors.

Jayhind Education Society, Atpadi, through Secretary, Sanpatrao Marutrao Deshmukh Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary and Anr.

Bhimrao Bapurao Atigre Vs State of Maharashtra through Dept. of Urban Development and Ors.