Writ petition challenging departmental proceedings and transfer order in service disciplinary case. Court found no prima facie case to interfere and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order vacated; departmental inquiry and transfer to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
(WP 749 of 2016).
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 749 OF 2016
Popat Ravan Garad ….Petitioner
Vs.
The Union of India and Ors. ….Respondents
Ms. Priyanka Mehndiratta for Petitioner
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 8, 2016
P.C. :
departmental inquiry is going on. In the meantime, the Petitioner was transferred to his native place and the inquiry is also being held at that place.
The Tribunal has given cogent reasons while dismissing the OA filed by the
Petitioner.
2/2
(WP 749 of 2016).
M.S. SONAK, J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is any prima facie case to interfere with the Tribunal's order dismissing the petitioner's OA in service disciplinary proceedings.
Whether the petitioner has established grounds to quash the transfer order and the pendency of the departmental inquiry under Article 226/227 of the Constitution.
Popat Ravan Garad
The Union of India
V. M. Kanade
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
