On the submission that the petitioner was granted furlough by the concerned authority, the High Court held that the purpose of the criminal writ petition was satisfied and disposed of it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 9-crwp-748.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.748 OF 2016
Danny Harpalsing Krupalsing..Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
and ors.
..Respondents
Mr.Vaishali Chaudhari (appointed), Advocate for
petitioner
Mr.D.R.Kale, APP for respondents
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 29, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.The learned A.P.P. appearing for the
respondents tenders across the Bar a copy of the
order releasing the petitioner on Furlough. The
same is taken on record.
3.Since the concerned authority has passed
the order releasing the petitioner on Furlough,
2 9-crwp-748.odt
the purpose of filing of this petition stands
satisfied. The petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
Danny Harpalsing Krupalsing
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court