Disposed
Sudarshan Maharana and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPLN/3261/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3261 OF 2016
(Sudarshan Maharana and others Vs. The State of
Maharashtra and another)
Mr. R.P. Dhase, Advocate for the applicants
Mr. A.R. Borulkar, A.P.P. for respondent No. 1/State
Mr. Nilkanth R. Pawade, Advocate for respondent No. 2
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 26th August, 2016
PER COURT:
The learned A.P.P. informs this Court that the
chargesheet is filed on 29th June, 2016.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the
applicants makes oral prayer so as to make amendment to
the application for challenging the chargesheet. We
cannot entertain such a prayer. The prayer stands
rejected.
3.In case the applicants are advised, they can
file an appropriate application before the concerned
Court. In case such an application is filed by the
applicants within a period of two weeks from today, the
2 criapln3261-2016
concerned Court shall decide the said application
within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing
of such application on its own merits and in case the
charge is not already framed. With these observations,
the application stands disposed of.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL][S.S. SHINDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
npj/criapln3261-2016
Sudarshan Maharana and others
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court