Writ petition directing Additional Collector, Pune to decide second land revenue appeal and stay application within one and three months respectively. Petition disposed of.
Direction to decide Stay application within one month and Second Appeal within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48-wp-7177.2016.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7177 OF 2016
Ravindra Laxman Lokhande
.. Petitioner Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. Akshay Petkar for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the respondent State. Mr.Vilas Tapkar for respondent no. 7.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 22, 2016.
P.C.
Not on board. In view of urgency, taken on production board.
The only relief claimed by the petitioner is to direct the appellate authority to decide the petitioner's appeal/stay application as expeditiously as possible. Keeping in view the aforesaid limited prayer, we direct the Additional Collector, Pune before whom the Petitioner's appeal (Second Appeal No. 337 of 2016) filed under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 is pending, to consider and decide the Stay application as expeditiously as possible but not latter than one month and the appeal not latter than three months, on its own merits. Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal and stay application need expedious decision.
Whether the Additional Collector can be directed to dispose of the first appeal within three months.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravindra Laxman Lokhande
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
