Review petition dismissed. Court held no case made out to review the impugned order dated 30/06/2016 and noted that scope of review is extremely limited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 44 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2276 OF 2015
Shree Dipty Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Jagdish N.Jayale, for the Petitioner. Ms.K.H.Mastakar, for Respondents No.1 to 3 -BMC. Mr.Mohit P. Jadhav, AGP for Respondent No.4 – State.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2016
P.C. :
. Matter is not on board. In view of urgency, taken up
in the production board.
Review Petition, we find that no case is made out to review order dated 30/06/2016. Even otherwise, scope of Review is
1/2
extremely limited. No case for interference is made out. Review Petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Shree Dipty Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
