The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected a writ petition filed by a petitioner challenging land regularization directions. Perusing pleadings, the court found no reason to entertain the petition and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7078.15wp
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 7078 OF 2015
DODHU DHADU PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Jadhav Narsing B AGP for Respondents/State : Mr.S.N.Morampalle.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & V.L. ACHLIYA, JJ. Dated: MARCH 15, 2016
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, perused pleadings in the petition, grounds taken therein, annexures thereto and the reply filed by the respondents. It is stated int he said reply that, the respondents/State, relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Jagpal Singh vs.
The State of Punjab1 , has issued a Government Resolution dated 12th July, 2011, thereby issuing directions to the Government authorities not to regularize the encroachment over the Gairan land. We need not go to the larger aspect of the matter. Suffice it to say that, the petitioner shifted to
1 (2011) 11 SCC 396;
7078.15wp
2
Nandurbar in the year, 1990 and also the petitioner possesses approximately four acres land besides the dam.
2 For the reasons aforesaid, we are not inclined to entertain the petition. Petition stands rejected.
(V.L. ACHLIYA, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jagpal Singh vs. The State of PunjabReferred¶11
Jagpal Singh vs. The State of Punjab (2011) 11 SCC 396 · Who else cites this
DODHU DHADU PATIL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
V.L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
